<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kino-Eye.com &#187; Demo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kino-eye.com/category/demo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kino-eye.com</link>
	<description>"Everybody who cares for his art, seeks the essence of his own technique." -- Dziga Vertov (1922)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Quick and dirty Kodak Zi9 camera test</title>
		<link>http://kino-eye.com/2008/11/15/kodak-zi9-quick-test/</link>
		<comments>http://kino-eye.com/2008/11/15/kodak-zi9-quick-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Tames</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMM110208]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickTime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zi9]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kino-eye.com/2008/11/15/kodak-zi9-quick-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Garfield purchased the cute little (OK, not so little, it&#8217;s larger than many competitors) Kodak Zi9 camera recently and brought it to the Boston Media Makers meeting. And while this $179 camera is not going to enter my short-list of favorite documentary cameras (on the list are Panasonic&#8217;s DVX100 &#038; HVX200, Sony&#8217;s A1U &#038; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="left-top" src='http://kino-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/zi6_bl_black02_250x200.jpg' alt='Kodak Zi6' />Steve Garfield purchased the cute little (OK, not so little, it&#8217;s larger than many competitors) Kodak Zi9 camera recently and brought it to the <a href="http://bostonmediamakers.wordpress.com">Boston Media Makers</a> meeting. And while this $179 camera is not going to enter my short-list of favorite documentary cameras (on the list are Panasonic&#8217;s DVX100 &#038; HVX200, Sony&#8217;s A1U &#038; EX1, and expect the Red Scarlet to join the list as soon as I actually get a change to use one) it offers an intriguing option for quick and dirty point and shoot image capture. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=13063&#038;pq-locale=en_US&#038;_requestid=8557">Kodak Zi9</a> is small enough to take with you everywhere you go, it&#8217;s simple enough you can hand it to anyone to shoot, and it&#8217;s cheap enough you don&#8217;t have to worry if it gets lost, stolen, or suffers damage when used in a risky situation. And the 720p image quality (encoded as H.264) is pretty good given the price. As the quality of camera sensors goes up, and the price of camera sensors and flash memory goes down, expect to see small cameras get better and better. They could soon rival the traditional camcorder, the only issue is over time how much are the camera manufacturers willing to cannibalize their traditional camcorder market. It&#8217;s a fun little camera, I hope to get a chance to do more shooting with it.</p>
<p><center>															<script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/scripts/pokkariPlayer.js?ver=2008010901"></script>					<script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/syndication/write_player?skin=js&#038;posts_id=1478182&#038;source=3&#038;autoplay=true&#038;file_type=flv&#038;player_width=620&#038;player_height=338"></script>
<div id="blip_movie_content_1478182">					<a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-QuickKodakZi6TestDarkInteriorWithLightFromWindow704.flv" rel="shadowbox[post-519]" onclick="play_blip_movie_1478182(); return false;"><img title="Click to play" alt="Video thumbnail. Click to play" width="620" height="338" src="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-QuickKodakZi6TestDarkInteriorWithLightFromWindow704.flv.jpg" border="0" title="Click to play" /></a>					<br />					<a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-QuickKodakZi6TestDarkInteriorWithLightFromWindow704.flv" rel="shadowbox[post-519]" onclick="play_blip_movie_1478182(); return false;">Click to play</a>					</div>
<p>										</center></p>
<p>This test was not about how pretty the video can look, it&#8217;s about how does the camera do in a common documentary situation. Here are the basic specs on the Kodak Zi9 camera:</p>
<p>Camera Type: Point and Shoot Camcorder<br />
Resolution/Sensor Size/Type: 1.6 megapixels 1/4.5&#8243; CMOS<br />
Lens: 4.1<small>mm</small> &#8211; F/2.8 (fixed focus) with 2x optical zoom<br />
Minimum Focus: 27.6&#8243; (macro focus: 2&#8243;)<br />
Display:  2.4&#8243; TFT active matrix LCD (no viewfinder, no flip-over display)<br />
Video Format: 16&#215;9 H.264 (MOV, AAC, LC) 720p @ 30fps or 60fps<br />
White Balance/Exposure: Automatic<br />
Sound In: Built-in Microphone (mono)<br />
Sound Out: Built-in speaker (mono) and audio on composite video output<br />
Computer Interface: USB 2.0<br />
Video Output: Composite video and Component video<br />
Digital Still Features: also shoots digital stills in JPEG format and has a built-in flash w/ close-up and normal modes, and red-eye reduction<br />
Internal Storage: 30 MB Flash Memory (built-in, specs do say 128M, however, only 30 can be used for image storage)<br />
Storage Slot: SD Memory Card, Kodak recommends use of SDHC High-Speed Card<br />
Additional Features: YouTube capture mode<br />
Power: Uses 2 AA NiMH rechargeable batteries (included along with a charger) or 2 AA Alkaline batteries (nice not to have to deal with a built-in LiIon battery like some other devices)<br />
Accessories: carrying pouch, cables, manual<br />
Warranty: one year<br />
Weight: 3.8 oz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino-eye.com/2008/11/15/kodak-zi9-quick-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-QuickKodakZi6TestDarkInteriorWithLightFromWindow704.flv" length="4633670" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of Camera vs. Boom Microphone</title>
		<link>http://kino-eye.com/2007/09/08/camera-vs-boom-mic/</link>
		<comments>http://kino-eye.com/2007/09/08/camera-vs-boom-mic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Tames</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technique]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kino-eye.com/2007/09/08/camera-vs-boom-mic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Here&#8217;s a quick comparison I did of recording dialog with an MKH60 Shotgun Microphone mounted on a camera vs. mounted on a boom. 

															
Click To Play
										
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://kino-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/picture-29.png' alt='picture-29.png' /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quick comparison I did of recording dialog with an MKH60 Shotgun Microphone mounted on a camera vs. mounted on a boom. </p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<p><center>															<script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/scripts/pokkariPlayer.js?ver=2007082501"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/syndication/write_player?skin=js&#038;posts_id=375108&#038;source=3&#038;autoplay=true&#038;file_type=flv&#038;player_width=400&#038;player_height=226"></script>
<div id="blip_movie_content_375108"><a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CameraVsBoomMicrophone186.flv" rel="shadowbox[post-275]" onclick="play_blip_movie_375108(); return false;"><img title="Click to play" alt="Video thumbnail. Click to play" width="400" height="226" src="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CameraVsBoomMicrophone186.flv.jpg" border="0" title="Click To Play" /></a><br /><a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CameraVsBoomMicrophone186.flv" rel="shadowbox[post-275]" onclick="play_blip_movie_375108(); return false;">Click To Play</a></div>
<p>										</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino-eye.com/2007/09/08/camera-vs-boom-mic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CameraVsBoomMicrophone186.flv" length="2743833" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon TX1 Movie Test</title>
		<link>http://kino-eye.com/2007/05/08/tx1-test/</link>
		<comments>http://kino-eye.com/2007/05/08/tx1-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 10:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Tames</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kino-eye.com/2007/05/08/tx1-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 OK, so the big question is, what&#8217;s the tiny Canon TX1 like as a video camera? To answer the question, I made a short video this weekend. I&#8217;m not much for testing with charts and side by side comparisons these days, image quality is only part of the camera equation, so instead I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 6px; margin-bottom: 3px"> </div>
<p> OK, so the big question is, what&#8217;s the tiny Canon TX1 like as a video camera? To answer the question, I made a short video this weekend. I&#8217;m not much for testing with charts and side by side comparisons these days, image quality is only part of the camera equation, so instead I do some shooting and from the results, I ask the question, is the image quality reasonable given all the other aspects of the camera that come into play when making the decision of what camera to purchase or use, for example, handling, form-factor, weight, cost, features, image processing, media formats, lens, ease-of use, etc.? </p>
<p><span id="more-250"></span></p>
<p>If you go to the <a href="http://blip.tv/file/223400">movie page on blip.tv</a>, under the &#8220;Play video in alternate format:&#8221; pop-up, you&#8217;ll have access to the following formats: 1. Large iPod Video (1:52, 21.2MB, 640 x 360 H.264, Stereo, default QuickTime Pro Export settings), 2. AppleTV Video (1:52, 50.3MB, 960 x 540, H.264, Stereo, default QuickTime Pro Export settings), 3. Flash version (transcoded by blip.tv, not sure of the exact settings, audio is 64 kbit/sec mono).  I&#8217;ve also posted to Flickr <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kino-eye/sets/72157600195782234/">a set of frame grabs from the original Motion JPEG frames</a> so you can see the quality of the image prior to compression for web delivery.</p>
<p><center>															<script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/scripts/pokkariPlayer.js"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/syndication/write_player?skin=js&#038;posts_id=227792&#038;source=3&#038;autoplay=true&#038;file_type=flv&#038;player_width=400&#038;player_height=224"></script>
<div id="blip_movie_content_227792"><a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CanonTX1TestMovie812.m4v" onclick="play_blip_movie_227792(); return false;"><img src="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CanonTX1TestMovie812.m4v.jpg" width="400" height="224" border="0" title="Click To Play" /></a><br /><a href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CanonTX1TestMovie812.m4v" onclick="play_blip_movie_227792(); return false;">Click To Play</a></div>
<p>										</center></p>
<p>All the video and audio was left &#8220;as is&#8221; with the TX1, no color correction or post-production processing on the audio or video, the only thing I did was import the video clips into Final Cut Pro and edit them on a DVCPRO HD timeline. Some horizontal resolution is lost going into the DVCPRO HD format, however, it&#8217;s pretty minor. </p>
<p>This test was designed to show the camera in real-world conditions, not in the best light, so there&#8217;s some shooting under relatively low light conditions. Most of the shots exhibit the noise that comes part and parcel with shooting in situations with less than optimum lighting. </p>
<p>Since the conversion to iPod movies and Flash for web viewing (which is what&#8217;s available on the blip.tv page) adds additional artifacts to the original image, and since the conversion from the Motion JPEG original to DVCPRO HD for editing also adds some additional artifacts, I&#8217;ve posted a series of frame grabs from the original video files so you can see the quality of the original Motion JPEG frames. </p>
<p>Video that is noisy does not compress as well as video that is clean to start with, so starting with an HDV or H.264 original would yield better compressed video than the Motion JPEG implementation in the TX1. In most shooting situations you&#8217;re going to see lots of noise in the image with this camera unless you&#8217;re shooting outdoors during the day.</p>
<p>Shots were made using auto white balance, 720p 30fps mode, auto focus (face tracking turned off). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kino-eye.com/2007/05/08/tx1-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blip.tv/file/get/Kinoeye-CanonTX1TestMovie812.m4v" length="22184835" type="video/mp4" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

