<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping laptop and desktop address books in sync</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kino-eye.com/2007/07/13/address-book-sync/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kino-eye.com/2007/07/13/address-book-sync/</link>
	<description>"Everybody who cares for his art, seeks the essence of his own technique." -- Dziga Vertov (1922)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:49:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://kino-eye.com/2007/07/13/address-book-sync/comment-page-1/#comment-89659</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kino-eye.com/2007/07/13/address-book-sync/#comment-89659</guid>
		<description>Update: SyncTogether 1.0 is not compatible with Leopard and Mark/Sense does NOT recommend using SyncTogether 1.0 with Leopard (10.5.x) at this time. They say they are investigating options and will report any changes in their SyncTogether forum. Leopard betas have been available for quite some time to developers, so I find it disconcerting that this late in the game they do not have a solid roadmap for Leopard compatibility. I have to now notch back my enthusiasm for the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: SyncTogether 1.0 is not compatible with Leopard and Mark/Sense does NOT recommend using SyncTogether 1.0 with Leopard (10.5.x) at this time. They say they are investigating options and will report any changes in their SyncTogether forum. Leopard betas have been available for quite some time to developers, so I find it disconcerting that this late in the game they do not have a solid roadmap for Leopard compatibility. I have to now notch back my enthusiasm for the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

